AMD RADEON HD 6700 SERIES COMPARED TO GTX 560 TI SERIES

AMD RADEON HD 6700 SERIES COMPARED TO GTX 560 TI SERIES

While everyone is free to speculate on whether there are ulterior motives, what is clear is that the 5700 series created a branding problem for AMD: the 5000 series was launched before ATI was rebranded AMD. Ultimately AMD considers this rebadging a necessity to some degree. Of course this wouldnвЂ™t be something AMD supports. If this is the case, then for any 5700 series designs being recycled for the 6700 series, it should be easy to use the 6700 series BIOS. Although AMD technically refers to UVD2.2 having вЂњfirmwareвЂќ, as far as we know everything is contained in the video cardвЂ™s BIOS. The good news here is that weвЂ™re not immediately aware of any reason why these features canвЂ™t be fully backported to existing 5700 series cards. Apparently this is consistent with Northern Islands, whcih doesn't support 2K x 4K resolutions over HDMI either. Update: AMD confirmed that the 6700 series only supports the HDMI 3D portions of the HDMI 1.4a spec. Meanwhile HDMI 1.3 and HDMI 1.4a both have the same bandwidth requirements, so now the 6700 series is HDMI 1.4a capable through some BIOS magic вЂ“ although we havenвЂ™t been able to get confirmation that this support extends beyond support for the frame-packed formats required for HDMI 3D, or in other words it may not support 2K x 4K resolutions and other features normally associated with HDMI 1.4a. In fact the UVD3 also have a Blu-Ray 3D PowerPlay state, which means UVD2 and UVD3 may be more similiar than we once thought. Without any hardware on hand we canвЂ™t specifically test this, but we suspect AMD may have introduced a new PowerPlay state (or edited an existing one) to further ramp up JuniperвЂ™s core clocks when playing MVC content, as this would be the most practical way to increase the max bitrate UVD2.2 can handle, if indeed it couldnвЂ™t handle MVC bitrates at the usual core clocks. UVD2.2 is fast enough to process MVC, so now the 6700 series can decode Blu-Ray 3D. These changes have been backported to Juniper to some extent. As you may recall, one of the big differences for the 6000 series over the 5000 series is that the 6000 series got HDMI 1.4a support, along with a UVD3 video decoder that was capable of decoding the additional resolutions and bitrates Blu-Ray 3DвЂ™s MVC(H.264) profiles require. However to be fair to AMD, they have at least made some effort to improve on the 6700 series over the 5700 series through the BIOS. The only thing different between a 5700 series card and its 6700 series counterpart is the sticker on the card, the BIOS, and quite possibly the price.

ItвЂ™s the same Juniper GPU on the same boards with the same clocks, the same power requirements, and the same performance.

ThereвЂ™s really no way to sugarcoat it, and even AMD isnвЂ™t really trying. Say hello to the Radeon HD 6770 and Radeon HD 6750. But here we are, out with the old and in with the old: the 57 are getting rebadged in retail. It was perhaps a foolish hope that these shenanigans would remain in the OEM market, as so far AMD has continued to keep the 57 even after the rest of Northern Islands has launched. More RAM, a Sandy Bridge CPU, a SSD вЂ“ their 2011 computers need to look better than their 2010 computers, as they certainly donвЂ™t want to be seen as selling last yearвЂ™s model for anything less than a steep discount. The rationale for OEM space is rather straightforward: OEMs want/need something new to sell. While weвЂ™ve only recently seen the rest of the Northern Islands lineup launch in the retail space, in the OEM space the last-generation Juniper GPU has been filling out AMDвЂ™s lineup between Turks (6500/6600) and Barts (6800) based video cards.

We are of course referring to the Radeon HD 6770 and Radeon HD 6750, AMDвЂ™s Juniper-powered 5770 & 5750 rebadges for OEMs.

We havenвЂ™t talked about it beyond a passing comment, but AMD still has some Radeon 6000 series cards that are OEM-only.

Amd radeon hd 6700 series compared to gtx 560 ti